News & Events
October 2010
Judith H. Dobrzynski
Here’s another list of important cultural heritage sites to worry about: 20 “on the verge” of experiencing irreversible, irreparable loss and destruction, according to the Global Heritage Fund.
Like UNESCO and the World Monuments Fund, GHF aims to shine a light on endangered sites; the main difference from them, as far as I can tell, is that GHF focuses exclusively on the developing world and it adds an economic argument for preservation.
In a release about its sites list, made public this morning, the GHF “estimates that there is a potential $100 billion per year opportunity by 2025 for the developing world to help achieve their UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to eradicate poverty if global heritage sites are protected and preserved.”
And along with the release of this report, GHF is holding a conference this Tuesday at Stanford to raise awareness of the problem, identify technologies and solutions, and raise funding to get rescues started. The agenda for that conference is here.
The 20 “on the verge” sites are:
The GHF report accompanying the list—Saving Our Vanishing Heritage: Safeguarding our Cultural Heritage Sites in the Developing World—pinned the blame for these troubled sites on five activities of man: development pressures, unsustainable tourism, insufficient management, looting, and war and conflict.
It calls for “a new Global Fund for Heritage comprised of emergency funding from governments, foundations and corporations to save our remaining heritage sites - specifically focused on the poorest countries and regions of the world.”
GHF says that it’s launching a new “early warning and threats monitoring system” that uses satellite imaging technology and ground reports “to enable international experts and local conservation leaders to clearly identify and solve imminent threats within the legal core and protected areas of each global heritage site.” It calls this the Global Heritage Network.
The whole report can be accessed here and a list of the sites, with their specific threats is here. All three GHF links are work checking out, if only for the marvelous site pictures.
I suppose there’s a reason GHF started up in 2001, per GuideStar, long after the World Monuments Fund, which dates to 1965. But they share the same mission. The GHNetwork also sound much like the MEGA project recently announced by the Getty Conservation Institute, which is starting with Jordan but has the ambitions and capability of monitoring countries all over the world. I recently saw a demonstration of MEGA and it’s fantastic.
Of course, there’s plenty of work for all in global heritage—the key will be avoiding duplication and stretching dollars to their limits.